Are judges seeing through the RSPCA at last?

>The Police aided and abetted this raid so they were just as bad as RSPCA. That’s normal.
>The police ignored what an RSPCA inspector was doing; not surprising.

As far as I know they defiantly cannot do anything forcefully to anyone. It’s the Police that only have the powers to restrain anyone or arrest. They certainly try to look like the Police in there appearance and they caution you just like the Police under (pace) anything you say and all that….
>It was police who locked me in a car for 6 hours while they illegally stole my animals;
(Unless they are signed over to them) As far as I know it’s the Police only that have the power to take animals away from anyone, that’s normally under RSPCA’s Vet advice. But, or if they believe that the Animal welfare act has definitely been contravened. That usually isn’t too hard for them to make up!
The Police take them into care and most of the time hand them over to the RSPCA.

The police ignored what rspca was doing they kept telling me to sign my pets over to them as they would take good care of them wouldn't they??? rspca love animals don't they it was police who locked me in a car for 6 hours while they illegaly stole my animals it was one officer who even stooped to taking away my mobile so that i had no contact with anyone my family didn't know where i was or what was happening to me they aided and abetted this raid so were just as bad as rspca they are in league with rspca

Moonstone, I'm wondering if you took action against the police? That they stood by and did nothing while you were assaulted by an rspca employee is most disturbing - surely you had a case against them?

Well trilby Bee i have noticed a pattern to their cases they seem to target the elderly pensioners with just their pets for company these are people who probably own their homes so rspca can ask for costs and a charge to be put on the property not stupid are they so they get the house and publicity and lots of donations too
They leave the gypsy horses to suffer as even if they take them the gypsies will plead poverty and they will get nothing BTW Zola is supposed to be in court again this week thaat's if rspca bother to turn up

Here was yet another easy target for them, an elderly and infirm lady walking with two sticks for God's sake. ell, at least good sense prevailed in the end. My friend's cousin, a retired magistrate, told us that she was well aware that the magistrates were getting fed-up with RSPCA bullying tactics. However, I did not find it so, and I still believe that many magistrates are hand in glove with them. Also their "expert witnesses" are greedy money-grabbing vets who do and say what they are told to do and say so that they will get a conviction, publicity from the conviction and donations rolling in as a result.
I take it the £28,000 costs was paid out of the donations from well-meaning people? It's good to know that the money is well-spent? Are they so thick that they cannot see they are stealing healthy animals? No doubt some miserable "concerned member of the public" who has never owned an animal and never spent a penny on feeding one possibly saw a skinny old cat (when they are 19 they have a tendency to lose weight) so thought they would put the world to rights. If she had three cockerels, they had obviously been handed to her by people who could not keep them as their crowing was causing complaints, so out of the kindness of her heart she took them in.
I would like to know when the RSPCA will get involved with the Grand National for starters, then there is the question of Halal meat which they also do not get involved with. No, let's pick on a poor old disabled lady feeding 13 unwanted cats. They make you want to puke.

This case has been posted from facebook forum
Rspca inspectors (mob handed ) raided 67 year old spinster Georgina Langley they took away (stole) her 13 cats 4 cockerals and 1 dog Sweetie..charging her with 13 counts of animal cruelty
Ms. Langley had lived in her house all her life and was known in the village as the "cat lady" she would take in animals from villagers she lived alone and these animals were her only companions
She had never been in any trouble nor been to court before within days of taking her pets they had PTS 5 cats
Her vet Mr.Smith from Lakeview vets demanded the bodies of 2 cats to get an independant post mortem done on them this was carried put by an independant at the RCF one was a ginger tom and the other a pregnant female about to give birth to 3 kits he found them both healthy with no problems not even fleas and wanted answers as to why rpsca had put them down
She was defended in court by Nigel Weller of east Sussex who has made something of a name for himself in defending cases against rspca
Rspca dropped 11 charges against Ms.langley before the case got to court and the judge found her guilty of one charge of failing to get vet treatment earlier
He refused rspca's request to make Ms.Langley pay £28.000 towards the court costs they had asked for a charge to be made against her house :evil:again this was refused.
He also refused to ban her from keeping animals for life and awarded her 1 cat her cockerals and dog to be given back to her she allowed the other remaining cats to be rehomed
This poor lady is disabled and walks with two sticks the judge said that she needed some help not to be dragged through the courts
So at last it seems that some judges are seeing rspca for what they really are money grabbing SCUMBAGS